"If the system kaput then die le?"
Which results to...
"Then you should know how to compute it"
After much explaination of hiow the theory we calculate the solution and why we need a machine to do it and such all this while yada yada yada.....the question continues...
"Then go and make sure the figures tally to the way you tell me it should be calculated"
Damn. And it involves a freaking yield curve that is system-calculated.
So much for having all the technology at the end of the day can't rely on them anyway.
While struggling to understand the freaking formula to calculate forward rates and such, I found this in the net....
But I think this math theory is biased. I somehow want to wish to challenge it, despite the fact that my brain is working on full capacity on the 3 earlier argument.
Because seriously , why must money be equal to problems? On a positive side, money can also be a solution.
In which case if we re-write the whole theory it'll be...
Money is the solution to all problems so...
Money = Solution
Women = Money (power of two)
Thus, Women = solution (Power of two)
Ambik ko...siap ada kuasa dua lagi!
Which sums to - the world is a better place if we have a positive mind. Women doesn't have to be a pain in the arse, men just create excuses as such to mirror the fact that they are lazy (thus there's always a time issue) to get more money (thus money becomes a problem) to please their women.
I know men who don't have that problem and made the existence of their better half (the women, of course) complimentary to their life.
I rest my case.